
A couple of weeks ago, I read in the NY Times an article about a woman who has vowed to read a book a day for a year. That's right. One book. One day.
She's retired and apparently very well off. She has some rules about what she reads. Some of them make sense and some of them are challenging. The books she reads are between 250 - 300 pages long. She never reads two books by the same author. She's going out of her way to read books from different cultures. And I'm guessing Jude Devereaux is not on her TBR stack.
A very, very long time ago, I made a resolution that I would read a book a week. I kept that resolution for a long time but have fallen off a lot in the past seven years. There were actually a couple of years when I probably read less than 10 books.
So I'm going to try to go back to this resolution now. I will read anything. Anything over 500 pages gets two weeks. Anything by Dostoevsky gets three weeks.
Fiction, non-fiction, new, old, I don't care.
I have made amends with the library (I had two books displaced by the infamous cleaning lady that were ridiculously overdue) and last week, picked up Relentless by Dean Koontz. Which I read. In a week.
And now I will tell you about Relentless by Dean Koontz.
Early in his career, Dean Koontz was a boogety-boo writer. Something happened maybe five or six years ago that changed him around completely. Oh, he still does some boogety-boo stuff, but the wonderful thing is that his work no longer seems to have this black cloud hanging over everything. In fact, most of what he writes now has a non-existentialist ending. This makes me happy.
Relentless is about a writer (go figure!) who is married to a wonderful woman (go figure!) and together they have a beyond-genius son. The main character gets a slashing, venomous review from a renowned critic. This delights the writer's agent but scares the writer. He's gotten bad reviews before but this seems vindictive and spiteful and very personal.
After the review, the Bad Critic (cast in my head as Philip Seymour Hoffman) appears almost magically in the writer's life and bad things, terrible things happen. The writer's house gets blown up. They take it on the lam. And yet, the Bad Critic is everywhere and always doing terrible, cruel things.
And why? Because the writer is just too damn happy. Too optimistic. Too non-existential. In fact, artists and writers who show these traits have had terrible, terrible things done to them, too. Because some people just don't want you to be happy. That's why.
I have a feeling I'm not the only one who noticed the uptick in Mr. Koontz's mood. No doubt he got a snide review from the Times or some such because of his new outlook.
This will not live on in the annals of great American literature. (Is there one? I mean, after Mark Twain?) It was a good quick read.
The part of Mr. Koontz's oeuvre that will live on, should live on are the "Odd" books. Sweet and poignant and with one of the best main characters I've read in years. I love Odd.
Next week, maybe:
"My Life as a Guinea Pig"
or
"Unquenchable"
Oh, the cover shown here is the British one. The American one is just too boring.








